Author: Richardson GM.
Source: Human Ecolog Risk Assessment.
Year: 1997
Comment:
This article finds that exposure levels to formaldehyde and methacrylic from BISGMA composite fillings are drastically below relevant reference doses.
Abstract / Excerpt:
“Concerns have been expressed regarding the health risks posed by chemical exposures from dental restorative materials. Dental materials are exempted from the pre?market review provisions for medical devices in Canada and, therefore, information on the risks of potential chemical exposures arising from such materials is lacking. An assessment of components and degradation products of the class of dental materials known as composite resins was undertaken to provide such chemical exposure and risk information.
A probabilistic assessment was undertaken of adult exposures to two principal components of composite resins – silica, bisphenol-A glycidylmethacrylate (BIS-GMA) — and two degradation products of BIS-GMA — formaldehyde and methacrylic acid. Assuming that the Canadian adult population with fillings had only composite resin materials, results indicated that average exposures to formaldehyde and methacrylic acid were 10,000 times and 1,600,000 times lower, respectively, than relevant reference doses. Worst case exposures were also well below applicable reference levels. Risks posed by exposures to BIS-GMA and silica could not be assessed due to a lack of published ingestion reference doses for these substances.
Gaps in the data base relating to the risks posed by composite resin dental materials were discussed, particularly in reference to the recently reported estrogenic potential of other degradation products of BIS-GMA.”
Citation:
Richardson GM. An assessment of adult exposure and risks from components and degradation products of composite resin dental materials. Human Ecolog Risk Assessment. 1997; 3(4):683-697.