Comparative study of fluoride released and recharged from conventional pit and fissure sealants versus surface prereacted glass ionomer technology.

Author: Salmerón-Valdés EN, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Alanis-Tavira J, Morales-Luckie RA.

Source: Journal of Conservative Dentistry: JCD.

Year: 2016

Comment:

Abstract / Excerpt:

CONTEXT:
The fluoride release of sealants in vitro shows a marked decrease. Giomers are distinguishable from manufactured resin-based sealants and contain prereacted glass-ionomer particles (PRG).

AIMS:
To compare the amounts of fluoride released from the main pit and fissure of a resin-based sealant with that from a Giomer and to assess the abilities of the sealant and the Giomer to recharge when exposed to regular use of fluoride rinse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:
The readings for the fluoride concentration were carried out for 60 days using a fluoride ion-specific electrode. After this period, the samples were recharged using a fluoride mouth rinse. The amount of fluoride released after this recharge was determined for 5 days. The data were analyzed using Student’s t- and analysis of variance tests.

RESULTS:
In general, all materials presented higher fluoride release in the first 24 h; G1 and G4 showed a higher fluoride release in this period. On the other hand, G3 and G1 presented the most constant fluoride release until the 8(th) day, wherein all the sealants considerably decreased in the amount of fluoride released.

CONCLUSION:
G1 and G3 released higher concentrations of fluoride, although no significant differences were found. Giomers recharged in the first 24 h after polymerization presented an improved and sustained fluoride release.

Citation: Salmerón-Valdés EN, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Alanis-Tavira J, Morales-Luckie RA. Comparative study of fluoride released and recharged from conventional pit and fissure sealants versus surface prereacted glass ionomer technology. Journal of Conservative Dentistry: JCD. 2016 Jan;19(1):41.