Author: Ylinen K, Löfroth G.
Source: Acta Odontol Scand.
Year: 2002
Comment:
In this Scandanvian study, both amalgam fillings and composite fillings are considered potential health risks.
Abstract / Excerpt:
“The aim of this study was to identify differences and similarities between the Nordic countries in dentists’ use of dental amalgam as a restorative material, and also their knowledge and attitudes about amalgam from health, environmental, ethical, economic and social points of view. Procedures for handling amalgam waste were also studied. A random sample of 250 dentists was drawn from the national registers of authorized dentists in each country in late autumn 1997. At the beginning of 1998, a questionnaire was sent to all the dentists in the study group. The response rate was 77.6% in Denmark, 73.2% in Finland, 78.8% in Norway, and 84.0% in Sweden. In Finland and Sweden the use of dental amalgam had almost ceased, particularly for younger patients, while in Norway and especially in Denmark it was still widely used. Dentists’ knowledge of the environmental effects of amalgam was confused, but most dentists had installed amalgam separators in their dental units by 1998. The majority of dentists in each country wanted to keep dental amalgam as a restorative material even in the future, and they did not want to ban the import of mercury to their home countries. Most dentists considered amalgam to be a health risk for at least some patients, and a great majority (from 76% in Sweden to 94% in Norway) considered composite as a possible odontological risk to patients. Since a majority of the dentists considered both amalgam and composites possibly harmful to patients, efforts to develop better alternatives to amalgam should continue.”
Citation:
Ylinen K, Löfroth G. Nordic dentists' knowledge and attitudes on dental amalgam from health and environmental perspectives. Acta Odontol Scand. 2002; 60(5):315-320.